Re: SV: Parrot multithreading?

[Dan Sugalski]

At 12:27 PM 9/24/2001 -0400, Michael Maraist wrote:
> > >then what about a win/win? we could make the event checking style a
> > >compile time option.
> >
> > Odds are you'll get per-op event checking if you enable debugging, since
> > the debugging oploop will really be a generic "check event every op" loop
> > that happens to have the "pending debugging event" bit permanently set.
> > Dunno whether we want to force this at compile time or consider some way to
> > set it at runtime. I'd really like to be able to switch oploops
> > dynamically, but I can't think of a good way to do that efficiently.
> >
>
>long-jump!!!

I did say *good* way... :)

>This would work well for fake-threads too

We're not doing fake threads. Luckily we don't need it for real ones.


                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk