On Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:04:43 -0700, Damien Neil wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:57:44PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>> >For clarification: do you mean async I/O, or non-blocking I/O?
>>
>> Async. When the interpreter issues a read, for example, it won't assume the
>> read completes immediately.
>
>That sounds like what I would call non-blocking I/O.
Nonono. Nonblocking IO returns immediately. Async IO lets the
interpreter go on with another thread, until the read is done.
--
Bart.
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Uri Guttman
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Dan Sugalski
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Uri Guttman
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Dan Sugalski
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Michael Maraist
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Michael Maraist
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Dan Sugalski
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Uri Guttman
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? David M. Lloyd
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Bart Lateur
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Dan Sugalski
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? David M. Lloyd
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Dan Sugalski
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? David M. Lloyd
- RE: SV: Parrot multithreading? Hong Zhang
- RE: SV: Parrot multithreading? Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Alan Burlison
- Re: SV: Parrot multithreading? Dan Sugalski
