On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 12:38:28AM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: > But then I'm one of those weird critters who doesn't understand what all the > complaining over XS is about. :) I'd be happy to do the XS coding if it came > down to it. I'll take a look at making the assembler and disassembler use the C packfile routines through XS. As I just mentioned in a previous mail, however, I'm not very happy with the current packfile API... should I go ahead and use the existing one (temporarily, I hope :>), or is this section not covered by the current feature freeze? - Damien
- 0.0.2 needs what? Damien Neil
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Simon Cozens
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Gregor N. Purdy
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Damien Neil
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Simon Cozens
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Dan Sugalski
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Gregor N. Purdy
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Simon Cozens
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Damien Neil
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Dan Sugalski
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Dan Sugalski
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Damien Neil
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Dan Sugalski
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Dan Sugalski
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Dan Sugalski