>>>>> "ABH" == Ask Bjoern Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Oh, why not? Does anybody actually *ever* check the return value of >> print? I think it's not as if we'd break a lot of code. ABH> uh, what? you don't do much socket programming now, do you? sockets ABH> breaks all the time. Disks runs out of space while you write to ABH> files. and so on and so on. Could someone enlighten this poor soul and tell me what I _can_ do with an error return from a print or close? Reporting it may be useless (disk full). While I'm asking, what does one do while switching around file descriptors and an error is returned. Is there anywhere to report it? <chaim> -- Chaim Frenkel Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print operator Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print oper... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print ... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a pr... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a pr... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should ... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should ... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should ... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print oper... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print ... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a pr... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print operator Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print operator Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 39 (v3) Perl should have a print oper... Peter Scott