David Corbin wrote:
> > I've got some vague ideas on solving all of these, I'll go into if
> > people like the basic concept enough.
not just in regexes, but in general, a way to extend the set of bratches
that Perl knows about would be very nice. for instance it is very difficult
for people using european keyboards to produce curlies; if it was possible to
say that Q is the opening brace and it matches against q later, or any arbitrary
characters, such as the single-character versions of << and >> which I am not
capable of producing, if it was possible to specify this in the code somewhere
for instance
$CORE::BRATCH{'Q'} = 'q';
(or maybe lexically scoped)
after that one could say
$isafromline = qrQ^Fromq;
for instance.
--
David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
perl -e'@w=<>;for(;;){sleep print[rand@w]}' /usr/dict/words
- RFC 145 (alternate approach) David Corbin
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) David Corbin
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) David Corbin
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Michael Maraist
- what (?x) are in use? (was RFC 14... Hugo
- Re: what (?x) are in use? (wa... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) David Corbin
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Buddha Buck
- XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?... Nathan Wiger
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?&l... David Corbin
