> In theory, all letters should be reserved to map to future flags for > the same reason. My recollection is that Larry specifically mandated this, and that's why (?p...) was changed to (??...) in 5.6.0.
- RFC 145 (alternate approach) David Corbin
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) David Corbin
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) David Corbin
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Michael Maraist
- what (?x) are in use? (was RFC 14... Hugo
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approa... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) David Corbin
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Buddha Buck