Ted Ashton wrote
> > 2) Also this proposition fails in one of my goals, which was to allow
> > arbitrary nesting of multiline comments. I believe this would be true
for
> > any function based solution.
>
> Negative.  If you use paired delimiters you're ok.
>
> qc( Here's a quick comment which actually contains
>     qc( another comment )
>     within it
>   );

Hmmm... you are correct about that, and this seems pretty promising.
Particularly if I could say:

qc~Here's a quick comment which actually contains
    qc*another comment*
    within it
~;

or choose to use any delimiter that I like.

--Michael

Reply via email to