Re: named parameters

[Nathan Wiger]

> Fair enough. If we were going to do it I would like to see it extend to:
> 
>  sub test ( $x, @y:[N], %z, $fh:isa(IO::Handle) ) {
> 
>  }

Is there an RFC for this yet? If not, I think there needs to be. I think
this would be really cool. 

Because it has opportunity for bloat, I would suggest it should be in a
pragma:

   use strict 'prototypes';

-Nate