Tom Christiansen wrote: > >I don't much care for m4; it's not so much better than cpp to be > >worth the notice. > > *Strongly* disagree. O.k., what I really meant was, When they're both incapable of doing the sorts of things I want a macro language to do, does it matter that one is gobs more powerful than the other? -- John Porter
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Larry Wall
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Peter Scott
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Michael Mathews
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why John Porter
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Johan Vromans
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Tom Christiansen
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why John Porter
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Steve Simmons
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why John Porter
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Tom Christiansen
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why John Porter
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Steve Simmons
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Jonathan Scott Duff
- Proto-RFC: A Standard Always-Live Preprocessor John Porter
- Re: Proto-RFC: A Standard Always-Live Preprocessor Dan Sugalski
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Russ Allbery
- Preprocessing (Was: Re: Recording what we decided *not... Johan Vromans
- Re: Preprocessing (Was: Re: Recording what we decided ... Russ Allbery
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Johan Vromans
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Glenn Linderman
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Tom Christiansen