Tom Christiansen wrote:
> >I don't much care for m4; it's not so much better than cpp to be
> >worth the notice.
> 
> *Strongly* disagree.

O.k., what I really meant was, When they're both incapable of doing
the sorts of things I want a macro language to do, does it matter
that one is gobs more powerful than the other?

-- 
John Porter

Reply via email to