Tom Christiansen wrote: > >Several macro processors exist and are easily available. I do not see > >the need to duplicate (parts of) their functionality in perl. > >Personally, I'd even trow out -P. > > Well, possibly, but especially if a cpp-like source filter module > is included standard. I don't mind cpp too much; but I'd really like something much more powerful than cpp. Hmm -- cpp++?? -- John Porter
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and wh... Michael Mathews
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, an... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, an... John Porter
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do... Larry Wall
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do... Peter Scott
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do... Michael Mathews
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do... John Porter
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do... Johan Vromans
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do... John Porter
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do... Steve Simmons
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do... John Porter
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do... John Porter
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do... Steve Simmons
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Proto-RFC: A Standard Always-Live Preproc... John Porter
- Re: Proto-RFC: A Standard Always-Live Pre... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do... Russ Allbery
- Preprocessing (Was: Re: Recording what we... Johan Vromans