Jonathan Scott Duff wrote: > Perl. :-) > > Isn't this what source filters is all about? There's something to be said for there being a standard, always-on preprocessor, the way C has cpp. While -P makes available a nice usable preprocessor for perl, not much code uses it, because not many programmers want to bother with the extra two keystrokes! Or perhaps more the point, -P is essentially never used in any of the canonical code examples, books, etc. -- John Porter Aus tiefem Traum bin ich erwacht.
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why John Porter
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Johan Vromans
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Tom Christiansen
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why John Porter
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Steve Simmons
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why John Porter
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Tom Christiansen
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why John Porter
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Steve Simmons
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Proto-RFC: A Standard Always-Live Preprocessor John Porter
- Re: Proto-RFC: A Standard Always-Live Preprocessor Dan Sugalski
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Russ Allbery
- Preprocessing (Was: Re: Recording what we decided *not... Johan Vromans
- Re: Preprocessing (Was: Re: Recording what we decided ... Russ Allbery
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Johan Vromans
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Glenn Linderman
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Tom Christiansen
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Johan Vromans
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why John Porter
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Glenn Linderman