On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Tuomas Lukka wrote: > On 4 Aug 2000, Ariel Scolnicov wrote: > > Well, first of all, > > 10:100, 30:200 > > is not the same: in Perl it comes out as > > 10..100, 30..200 > > 10, 11, ... , 100, 30, 31, .., 200 > Additionally, generically it would not necessarily have to be a range of integers. The range could be specified as floating point if we are specifying a slice in physical coordinates. -- Tim Jenness JCMT software engineer/Support scientist http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/~timj
- Re: Reduce [was: Re: Random i... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Contexts [was:Reduce[Re:]... raptor
- Re: Contexts [was:Reduce[Re:]... Piers Cawley
- Re: Contexts [was:Reduce[Re:]... raptor
- Re: Reduce [was: Re: Random items... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Reduce [was: Re: Random i... Martyn Pearce
- Re: Reduce [was: Re: Random i... Jeremy Howard
- Re: PDL-P: Re: Reduce [was: R... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: PDL-P: Re: Reduce [was: R... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: PDL-P: Re: Reduce [was: R... Tuomas Lukka
- Re: PDL-P: Re: Reduce [was: R... Tim Jenness
- Re: PDL-P: Re: Reduce [was: R... Tuomas Lukka
- Re: PDL-P: indexing Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: PDL-P: indexing Jeremy Howard
- Re: PDL-P: Re: Reduce [was: R... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: PDL-P: Re: Reduce [was: R... Jeremy Howard
- Re: PDL-P: Re: Reduce [was: R... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Random items (old p5p issues) Graham Barr
- Re: Random items (old p5p issues) Alan Burlison
- Re: Random items (old p5p issues) Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Random items (old p5p issues) Dan Sugalski