Gosh, just unlink() leave it as it is. --tom
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone skud
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone John Porter
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone Bart Lateur
- RE: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone Myers, Dirk
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone Spider Boardman
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alon... Spider Boardman
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alon... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone Russ Allbery
- RE: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone Fisher Mark
