Ken Fox wrote: > And neither did you... ;) The last line should be: > > : $_[0] < 2 + $_[1] * atan($pi/$_[2]) or die $_[3] > > That's why curried functions should automatically re-curry themselves > instead of depending upon lazy programmers. ;) > But of course I only included this 'intentional' error in order to make a point ;-) <Yeah right, Jeremy, we believe you>
- RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order function... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions John Porter
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Damian Conway
- Different higher-order func notation? (was Re... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Different higher-order func notation?... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func notat... Mike Pastore
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Nathan Wiger