On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 11:27:27AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote: > Steve Simmons writes: > > . . . IMHO the RFC editor should be responsible for this. > > IMHO someone should write an RFC on why perl6 should NOT have > comments. The RFC editor doesn't have time to follow these zillions > of discussions and write documents based on them. Ooog, horrible phrasing on my part. That should read ``the editor of the RFC which is rejected.'' Sorry....
- Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Steve Simmons
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and wh... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, an... Steve Simmons
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do... Michael Mathews
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* t... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Recording what we decided *n... Michael Mathews
- Re: Recording what we decide... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Recording what we decide... John Porter
- Re: Recording what we de... Larry Wall
- Re: Recording what we de... Peter Scott
- Re: Recording what we de... Michael Mathews
- Re: Recording what we de... John Porter
- Re: Recording what we de... Johan Vromans