Re: Different higher-order func notation? (was Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions)

[Damian Conway]

   > And there's no argument about having anonymous, positional, and named
   > placeholders in the redraft...?

There's *always* arguments! ;-)

Personally, if we have positional placeholders I don't see the need
for named ones too. But I'm willing to be convinced.

Damian