On Sun, 06 Aug 2000 21:54:47 -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote: >Seems to me that a leading _ is worse for this than ^ Whatever prefix you choose, it should NEVER EVER be a \w character. And the general rule, until now at least, is that only characters from the ASCII repertoire are acceptable for progamming language syntax. (I merely have reservations WRT variable names, using accented characters or something.) -- Bart.
- Re: Different higher-order func notat... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func notat... Damian Conway
- Re: Different higher-order func notat... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func notat... Glenn Linderman
- Re: Different higher-order func notat... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Different higher-order func notat... Bart Lateur
- Re: Different higher-order func notat... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func notat... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func notat... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Different higher-order func notat... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Different higher-order func notat... Bart Lateur
- Re: Different higher-order func notat... John Porter
- Re: Different higher-order func notat... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func notat... Peter Scott
- Re: Different higher-order func notat... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Different higher-order func notation?... Damian Conway
- Re: Different higher-order func notation? (was Re... Ken Fox
- Re: Different higher-order func notation? (wa... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func notation? (was Re: RFC... Peter Scott
- Re: Different higher-order func notation? (was Re: RFC... Bart Lateur
- Re: Different higher-order func notation? (was Re... Jonathan Scott Duff