At 06:23 PM 8/9/00 +0000, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: >Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Operator overloading is scheduled to be revamped. > >While I remember - it would be good if overload mechansim >could be extended to cover && and || Yes. >as well as & and | >with the class deciding if short-circuit happens. No. I don't want to see && or || and not know whether it short-circuits without looking in the class interface. My brain is conditioned through years of C and Perl to expect that they always short-circuit. This is too venerable a semantic to change. Please. -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies
- RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have builtin string SCALA Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have builtin strin... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have builtin s... Spider Boardman
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have built... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have b... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should h... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have built... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have b... Nathan Wiger
- Overloading && || Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Overloading && || Peter Scott
- Re: Overloading && |... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Overloading &&am... Peter Scott
- Re: Overloading && || Damian Conway
- Re: Overloading && || Damian Conway
- Re: Overloading && || Peter Scott
- Re: Overloading && || Dan Sugalski
- Re: Overloading && |... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Overloading && || Nathan Torkington
- Re: Overloading && || Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Overloading && |... Dan Sugalski