> Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Operator overloading is scheduled to be revamped. > > While I remember - it would be good if overload mechansim > could be extended to cover && and || as well as & and | > with the class deciding if short-circuit happens. Oh, definitely. I need lazily evaluated args for that, but (of course) there's an RFC in the pipeline to cover that too :-) Damian
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have builtin string SCALA Spider Boardman
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have builtin string ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have builtin str... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have builtin... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have builtin string ... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have builtin str... Nathan Wiger
- Overloading && || Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Overloading && || Peter Scott
- Re: Overloading && || Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Overloading && || Peter Scott
- Re: Overloading && || Damian Conway
- Re: Overloading && || Damian Conway
- Re: Overloading && || Peter Scott
- Re: Overloading && || Dan Sugalski
- Re: Overloading && || Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Overloading && || Nathan Torkington
- Re: Overloading && || Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Overloading && || Dan Sugalski
- Re: Overloading && || Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Overloading && || Dan Sugalski
- Re: Overloading && || Chaim Frenkel