Re: Overloading && ||

[Nick Ing-Simmons]

Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>I have often wondered whether a language could allow user-defined 
>>operators.  The fact that none have done it should be a clue :-)
>
>What, like C++? ("I don't believe in it?" "What, C++? Just a conspiracy of 
>computer programmers?")

You cannot as far as I aware define new operators in C++ - just redefine the
ones you have. I cannot decide that '>|<' is  now an operator.

>
>>I guess it's getting too incestuous with the lexer.

That is the root of the problem.

-- 
Nick Ing-Simmons