On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Michael Mathews wrote: > To be fair, neither of these are examples of using a comment function for > "comments" though, but rather using a comment function to disable sections > of code and I suppose that makes as much sense as using POD to disable code. This is another instance where a macro preprocessor might be useful. (My previous example was an alternative to some of the higher-level function proposals.) In cpp (though I'd not recommend that particular "language" for Perl): #if 0 ..disabled code... #if 0 ..older disabled code... now in nested disables #endif ..more disabled code #endif Just hoping that looking at it from another skewed viewpoint may inspire someone, Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042
- Re: RFC 79 (v1) Code which is both executable and POD. John Porter
- Re: RFC 79 (v1) Code which is both executable and POD... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 79 (v1) Code which is both executable and... John Porter
- Re: RFC 79 (v1) Code which is both executable... Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 79 (v1) Code which is both execut... John Porter
- Re: RFC 79 (v1) Code which is both e... Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 79 (v1) Code which is both e... John Porter
- Re: RFC 79 (v1) Code which is both executable and... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 79 (v1) Code which is both executable and... Michael Mathews
- Re: RFC 79 (v1) Code which is both executable and POD... Michael Mathews
- Re: RFC 79 (v1) Code which is both executable and... Andy Dougherty
- Re: RFC 79 (v1) Code which is both executable... John Porter
- Re: RFC 79 (v1) Code which is both executable and... John Porter