Eric Roode wrote: > Adjust your thinking a bit, not the language. Try: > %my_fruit_set = (orange => 1, lemon => 1); >or > @my_fruit_set{qw/orange lemon/} = (); Yes, probably, this could be easiest... :) But, maybe because I'm a mulish person, I still thinking that if we actually use such ingenuity it is beacause the language miss of the very very USEFULL functions I'm desperatly, alone in the dark, without any voice responding in my way, asking for ! :) Gael,
- Please take RFC 179 discussion ... skud
- Re: Please take RFC 179 discuss... Gael Pegliasco
- Re: Please take RFC 179 discuss... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Please take RFC 179 discuss... Gael Pegliasco
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions... Gael Pegliasco
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions... John Porter
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to m... Gael Pegliasco
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to m... John Porter
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to m... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set the... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions fro... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions fro... Tom Christiansen