Re: Please take RFC 179 discussion to -data

[Jeremy Howard]

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Could we please take discussion of 179 to -data?  I think that's where
> > it should be.
> >
> > K.
>
> Personnally, I don't see any objection to this.
> If everybody is ok, why not ?
>
> How should I process ? Submit again the proposal with a modified
> mailing-list email ?
>
> Gael,

Yes.

If you do this, I suggest you take the opportunity to fill out RFC 179 with
more detail. In particular:

 - Why you think set operations should work on arrays rather than hashes
 - In what way the current Set:: modules are insufficient
 - Why set operations should be added to the core rather than a module

That way the list will be able to understand the reasoning behind the RFC
better.