On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 08:36:32AM -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote: > against them. The whole point of this Perl 6 process is to develop a > language that the community thinks is the right direction, right? Really? I thought the whole point of this was to develop suggestions to put to Larry, for him to consider and evaluate. In a perfect world, "the community" can agree on a "right direction", and we'd be following that. As we've seen, not only is it difficult to agree, but even agreeing on a direction is no guarantee that it's right. -- "I find that anthropomorphism really doesn't help me with a place full of bugs." -- Megahal (trained on asr), 1998-11-06
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Nathan Wiger
- one major flaw in the RFC processn Simon Cozens
- one major flaw in the RFC processn Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentat... Buddha Buck
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for docume... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... Frank Tobin
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... Frank Tobin
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for docume... Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentat... Robin Berjon
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentat... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for docume... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... Adam Turoff