Uri Guttman wrote: > if i want TIL and lose builtin overloading, that is > a fine tradeoff to me. No, no, no! That is one of the things that absolutely must be fixed in the next major version of Perl! </HO> -- John Porter
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Nathan Torkington
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Uri Guttman
- Acceptable speeds (was Re: TIL... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re:... Uri Guttman
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re:... Adam Turoff
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re:... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re:... Uri Guttman
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re:... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re:... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re:... Steve Fink
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... John Porter
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Uri Guttman
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Russ Allbery
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Simon Cozens
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Dan Sugalski
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Uri Guttman
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Adam Turoff
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Uri Guttman
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? Jerrad Pierce
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? foo . bar