On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:37:02 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
>Let's put it a different way - if we can find a short operator which
>is readily accessible on most people's keyboards, then that would
>score over a longer operator which is readily accessible on most
>people's keyboards. Maybe ~ isn't that operator. Maybe & is, or ^ or
>#, or whatever.
'~' is not good because it's very hard to reach. But "^" is a deadkey
too, so this one also needs pressing a space.
If you want something that's easy to type and that won't conflict with
current Perl, try "!".
Too bad "_" is a word character.
--
Bart.
- Re: Tying & Overloading Damien Neil
- Re: Tying & Overloading Simon Cozens
- Re: Tying & Overloading Bart Lateur
- RE: Tying & Overloading Henrik Tougaard
- Re: Tying & Overloading Simon Cozens
- RE: Tying & Overloading Henrik Tougaard
- Re: Tying & Overloading Dan Sugalski
- Re: Tying & Overloading John Porter
- Re: Tying & Overloading Dan Sugalski
- Re: Tying & Overloading Simon Cozens
- Re: Tying & Overloading Bart Lateur
- Re: Tying & Overloading John Porter
- Re: Tying & Overloading Edward Peschko
- Re: Tying & Overloading James Mastros
- Re: Tying & Overloading Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Tying & Overloading Andy Dougherty
- Re: Tying & Overloading nick
- Re: Tying & Overloading Austin Hastings
- Re: Tying & Overloading Michael G Schwern
