Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity

[Bart Lateur]

On Fri, 04 May 2001 15:05:12 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:

>Have you considered allowing Unicode characters as alternatives to some of 
>the less pleasant looking bits? $foo<<1>> (where << and >> are the double 
>angle characters) as an alternative to $foo\Q[1] if the user's got the 
>characters handy?

Until now, all characters with a special meaning for the syntax of the
language, are in the ASCII range. I see no reason to change that. This
is the case for most programming languages, with as a notable exception
APL.

-- 
        Bart.