> The implication is that we can only provide advanced "PRE_LAST"
> style blocks (or their equiv.) on the C<foreach> loop. The fact
> that they are impossible on the C<while> loop should not
> constrain our thinking for the C<foreach> loop.
Just checking here: is PRE_LAST a separate and non-mutually exclusive
concept from LAST? I.e., would this make sense:
foreach @arr -> $i {
PRE_LAST {print "before last loop\n"}
LAST {print "after last loop\n"}
print "$i\n";
}
If so, wouldn't look-aheads still result in chaos and confusion for tied
arrays?
If not, then I'd definitely disagree: to me, for's and while's are just
different flavors of "loop" and should behave the same in every way
possible.
-Miko
