On Sat, 2002-08-31 at 07:07, Damian Conway wrote: > Aaron Sherman wrote: > > > Is C<\n> going to be a rule (e.g. C<< <eol> >>) > > There might be an named rule like that. But C<\n> will certainly > still be available. > > > or is it implicitly translated to: > > > > <[\x0a\x0d...]>+ > > No. It will be equivalent to: > > <[\x0a\x0d...]> > > (no repetition)
Didn't A5 or E5 say that C<\n> was going to match sequences like C<\x0d\x0a> so that file formats that treat this as EOL would be supported natively? Was this a mistake? If it's not a mistake, then is there a way to minimally match "the first end-of-line character, regardless of what follows it (even if it's another end-of-line character)? That was the crux of my question. On the union operator stuff, thanks; I'd forgotten about that.
