Aaron Sherman wrote:
> So, for example here are some translations of existing operators:
>
> + <={.count > 0}>
> * <={1}>
> *? <={1}>?
> <8> <={.count == 8}> # No optimization possible!
Could it be done this way?:
@c:=(.)* <( @c == 8 )>
Surely inefficient, but it works right (I think). Would there be a more
efficient way to do it within the existing system?
It's easy to do non-greedy, too. Just slap a question mark on the end of
that star.
Luke
