--- Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Michael Lazzaro wrote: > : For this version of the operator list, (since I am unsure that > _every_ > : unary/binary op has a meaningful hyper, and some tentatively have > : _two_) I have placed all of them in EXPLICITLY. Please check that > I > : didn't miss any, or put any in that are incorrect. > > The problem with cut-and-paste of the regular table is that all the > errors are copied too. > > Maybe we should just say that you can put it anywhere that makes > sense, > and let the perl parser sort out the sheep from the goats. The basic > rule is that for any op, [op] is also expected in the same place. So > if the user defines a postfix:! for factorial, they automatically get > _[!] for that as well. >
What is the correct order of specification for vectorized postfix operators versus indices? @subset = @biglist[++][$min .. $max]; @subset = @biglist[$min .. $max][++]; I think the second one suggests (and this should probably be supported, for the taglinenoise crowd, if no one else) that the postincrement applies only to the subrange. =Austin __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
