On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 11:23:56AM -0800, Michael Lazzaro wrote: : On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 11:14 AM, Damian Conway wrote: : >Larry wrote: : > : >>: I agree. As long as it's not C<is slurpy>! : >>Of course not. We're trying to encourage the use of line noise, : >>and discourage the use of the long variants, so the long one would : >>have to be C<is slurpificatious>. : > : >Riiiiiiiiiiight! Thank-you, General Haig. : > : >Of course, C<is variadic> (my own preference for the name of this : >trait) would probably have much the same effect. ;-) : : Can we get a final answer, for the (documented) record?
No. I have to wait till Damian isn't looking. Larry
