Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 01:44:44PM +0200, Juerd wrote: > : A few days ago, when typing ./pugs,... You can guess the rest :) > : > : I suggest > : > : ./method > : > : to mean $?SELF.method, and > : > : ../method > : > : to mean $?SELF.SUPER::method, or however that's normally written. > > That's almost terminally cute, but I like it. Unless someone can > think of a major objection (such as that it makes it too easy to use > SUPER semantics rather than NEXT semantics), let's go with it.
Does this mean private methods will be called like this? ./:method() FWIW, I like the original spec best. I'm not sure that the problems with it aren't being exaggerated. But I've not written much Perl 6 yet either... -- matt diephouse http://matt.diephouse.com