Interesting. It strikes me that the procedure resulted in a core that is more English-speaking, more US. I wonder why? Is it that the ratio of English,US committers has increased over time? I know that any discussion I hold in anything other than French costs me extra efforts. If the discussion is an argument, held in English, with/against a native English speaker, I start with an obvious handicap. If the argument becomes aggressive or literary, the handicap can become quite huge. I'm not saying that this explains the shift in the BSD core; I don't have enough data. But I wonder what would happen if the same procedure were applied to Perl. And, before anybody shoots me with a "what are you suggesting? quotas?", let me say, no, that is not my proposal. Let's not spread the Belgian disease <gg> Proposals I have none... -- Jean-Louis Leroy http://users.skynet.be/jll
- how the FreeBSD project gets its "core members"... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: how the FreeBSD project gets its "core mem... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: how the FreeBSD project gets its "core... Adam Turoff
- Re: how the FreeBSD project gets its "... Stephen Zander
- Re: how the FreeBSD project gets its &q... Adam Turoff
- Re: how the FreeBSD project gets its "... Nathan Wiger
- Re: how the FreeBSD project gets its &q... Adam Turoff
- Re: how the FreeBSD project gets i... Stephen Zander
- Re: how the FreeBSD project ge... Kurt D. Starsinic
- Re: how the FreeBSD projec... Stephen Zander
- Re: how the FreeBSD project gets its "core mem... Jean-Louis Leroy
- Re: how the FreeBSD project gets its "core... Stephen Zander
- I18N of Perl 6 (was: how the FreeBSD projec... Jorg Ziefle
- Re: I18N of Perl 6 (was: how the FreeBS... Simon Cozens
- Re: I18N of Perl 6 (was: how the F... Jorg Ziefle
- Re: I18N of Perl 6 (was: how the F... Adam Turoff