On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 11:05:43AM -0800, Steve Fink wrote: > David Grove wrote: > > > Also, as far as documentation goes, I think it _should_ be written by > > apprentices, so that non-masters can understand it too. That's always been > > a huge criticism of the perldocs. That's not grunt work. That's proper > > allocation of duties to the best suited personnel for the benefit of the > > project. > > Except it's a particular duty that nobody really likes to perform. Which > pushes it into the realm of grunt work. Bah. *I* like documenting. K.
- Re: Perl Apprenticeship Program Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl Apprenticeship Program Steve Fink
- Tech documentation (Re: Perl Apprenticeship P... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Tech documentation (Re: Perl Apprenti... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Tech documentation (Re: Perl Apprenti... Mike Lacey
- Re: Tech documentation (Re: Perl Apprenti... David Grove
- Re: Tech documentation (Re: Perl Apprenti... Kirrily Skud Robert
- Re: Tech documentation (Re: Perl Appr... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Tech documentation (Re: Perl Appr... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Tech documentation (Re: Perl Appr... David Grove
- Re: Perl Apprenticeship Program Kirrily Skud Robert
- Re: Perl Apprenticeship Program David Grove
- Re: Perl Apprenticeship Program Nicholas Clark
- Re: Perl Apprenticeship Program David Grove
- Re: Perl Apprenticeship Program Dave Storrs
- Re: Perl Apprenticeship Program David Grove
- Re: Perl Apprenticeship Program Casey R. Tweten
- Re: Perl Apprenticeship Program David Grove
- Re: Perl Apprenticeship Program Casey R. Tweten
- Re: Perl Apprenticeship Program Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl Apprenticeship Program Nick Ing-Simmons