Since you continue to insult the maintainers, I will step in to defend them: the response you got to 145 was perfectly reasonable. You were told that you opened it in the wrong place, which you argued with, and you were told where you should have opened it instead, which you ignored. The problem was you.
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020, 6:29 PM ToddAndMargo via perl6-users < perl6-users@perl.org> wrote: > On 2020-01-19 15:09, Tobias Boege wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Jan 2020, ToddAndMargo via perl6-users wrote: > >> RFE: Please add the following examples to routine +^ > >> https://github.com/Raku/doc/issues/3177 > >> > >> Now I wait and see what kind of reception I get. It > >> will be nice to contribute to the docs, rather than > >> just always griping about them > >> > > > > Oh well, I just responded with what my gut told me when this arrived > > in my inbox. Didn't know that I would be part of a public experiment. > > > > Anyway, godspeed! > > > > Regards, > > Tobias > > > > Hi Tobias, > > So far I am absolutely tickled over the > thoughtful and constructive responses I have > been seeing, yours being one of them. > > This is the reception I was afraid of: > https://github.com/rakudo/star/issues/145 > > And so far not a sign of 145's response/culture. > > This is an example of how issue 145 above should > have been handled (my bug report as well): > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773142 > 1) I reported the bug > 2) they told me to go to upstream and where > 3) I opened the bug on to upstream, reported it > back to Fedora, Fedora kept the bug open > 4) upstream resolved the issue, Fedora patched > the program under the original bug. > 5) joy. ZERO ARGUING. Very professional. > > I am looking forward to contributing more stuff > in the future! > > :-) > > -T >
