On Jun 28, 2006, at 5:12 PM, Craig DeForest wrote:
.. start diking out and rearranging code.
A 2.4.3 release (even if not perfect) will go a long way toward
usability, since 2.4.2 was so evidently flawed. Folks have been very
kindly testing on different platforms, and I think we have even more
stability and breadth now than when 2.4.2 was released.
Are there any objections? If not, I'll sift through the Changes file
and make a Release Notes file for 2.4.3 over the weekend -- we can
test during the next week and release by the end of the week (unless
something major comes up).
Cheers,
Craig
Can we still call it a 2.4 series release when the "experimental"
per-piddle bad-value code change means that compiled modules will have
to be rebuilt to use the new release (or at least I think they will as
there have been changes to some internal data structures). However, I
don't think there's enough in it to warrant upping the version to 2.5.
Doug
_______________________________________________
Perldl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
