On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Matthew Kenworthy <[email protected] > wrote:
> [AST's license is] GPL. We own the code so we can be reasonably flexible >> on this (although probably not Artistic) > > > ...I don't know if the GPL for AST is open enough(!) but skimming through > the Debian packages lists, I can't see AST in there anywhere. > > Do you know if AST was ever submitted and/or rejected from Linux > distributions because of its license? > You lost me. Why would Debian or anybody else ever reject a project because it was licensed under the GPL? :) As I understand it, Perl-end uses should be governed by the license of the Perl bindings, so even if the underlying library is GPL, any Perl-end uses should be governed by the LGPL (or whatever). Please, somebody correct me if I'm wrong. David
_______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
