The new chapter-based output is much better. I would suggest that Karl's background of PDL be placed in as a Forward to the book (which is what it is).
Also, Craig's book input might make a better framework with which to consolidate the current sections and would provide a reasonable TOC as well. Currently, some of the explanations are more reference list-like rather than explanatory. I'll work on cleaning up the 3D graphics for you by tomorrow. Cheers, Chris On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Matthew Kenworthy <[email protected]> wrote: >> This is a first draft, so I would be happy to just have the content on CPAN. >> A pdf would be better for a number of reasons, but we need to get this thing >> OUT and start getting feedback. >> >> Again, because this is a first draft, I propose creating individual pdfs, >> then using pdftk to glue them together. We could even add per-chapter >> headers using pdftk. > > Hi David, > > Oh sure, I can use pdftk and other pdf tools, I just wanted others to > be able to do it without adding another dependency. But there's no > problem generating a one off draft that we can put out :) > > In fact, I'd looked at going to HTML first and then HTML to PDG, > because pod2pdf seems to drop all hyperlinks in its formatting, which > defeats the point a bit. > > But yes, content is the top point! > > Matt _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
