Thanks for the crosscheck. I guess we can apply the patch to master and I'll see about getting a new CPAN developers release out in a week or so. I'll apply this evening unless someone beats me to it.
Cheers, Chris On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Sisyphus <[email protected]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "chm" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 4:54 AM > > Subject: Re: [Perldl] PDL and perl 5.16.0 release testers needed > > >> On 5/6/2012 11:49 AM, chm wrote: >>> >>> Here are the links to the various tickets: >>> >>>> >>>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3518253&group_id=612&atid=100612 >>>> >>>> https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=76577 >> >> >> I don't have 5.16 but looking at the tests, it >> appears that the variables in use are globals >> in package main:: and t/01_edit_distance.t is >> definitely not 'use strict;' safe. >> >> It would be interesting to see if switching to >> my and 'use strict' and ensuring that the various >> variables are all cleared/initialized appropriately >> would cause the test to pass. > > > I've edited 01-distance.t to make it 'use strict;' safe. > (See attached - perhaps you had additional steps in mind. There are still > some 'our' variables there.) > The attached version still needs the patch that Slaven provided in order to > pass on 5.16. > > That patch works for me on both 32-bit and 64-bit blead, and doesn't break > any of the tests in the PDL-2.4.10_003 test suite for earlier perl versions. > (Checked for 5.8.9, 5.10.0, 5.12.0 and 5.14.0.) > > Cheers, > Rob _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
