On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:58 AM, David Mertens <[email protected]> wrote: > > If we go that far, then I think we could benefit a lot by using structured > exceptions. CHM, are structured exceptions on our list? Can that be rolled > into the warnings cleanup?
Better errors and diagnostics definitely are. If you have ideas for a mnemonic feature request on this/these topics, please open a ticket. --Chris > On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Piero Ranalli <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> reading the following line from Ingo: >> >> > Far less important but still, the barf on multielement piddles! >> >> I remembered another thing that maybe could be improved. When there's >> an error message, it points to within the PDL source code, as in the >> following one-liner: >> >> piero$ perl -MPDL -E '$q=sequence 10; say $q->at(11);' >> Position out of range at Basic/Core/Core.pm.PL (i.e. PDL::Core.pm) line >> 3300. >> >> I'd really like the message to point at my code, instead of PDL's. >> Would it be difficult for PDL to use Carp (or any similar approach)? >> >> >> regards, >> Piero _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
