morning Chris, On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Chris Marshall <[email protected]>wrote: > > - How long have you used PDL? > since v2.4.2 (March 2005?)
> - What PDL version do you use? > v2.4.3 (*old* box), v2.4.11, v2.006_90 (for PDL_Indx testing) > - Best thing(s) about PDL > It's Perl, it's fast, and (to borrow a phrase from the camel book) it makes the easy (numeric) stuff easy and the harder stuff possible. > - Worst thing(s) about PDL > Use of lvalue subs makes many stock perl debuggers choke (at least on most of my code); I believe this has been solved already, I'm just waiting for it to reach the distributions. - I would use PDL more (or at all) if only ... > (a) ... there was native PP/XS/C-level support for sparse matrices, and/or (b) ... my research problems were more amenable to representation as numeric data > - Any suggestions for PDL development? > see above :-) marmosets & thanks for all your work! Bryan -- Bryan Jurish "There is *always* one more bug." [email protected] -Lubarsky's Law of Cybernetic Entomology
_______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
