Ok, but I think a "real" citation that appears in the references is better.
I used this in a paper that got accepted yesterday:
@Article{PDL,
author = {Karl Glazebrook and Frossie Economou},
title = "{PDL: The Perl Data Language}",
journal = {Dr.\ Dobb's Journal},
year = 1997,
url = {http://www.ddj.com/184410442},
volume = {Software Careers Special Issue},
}
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Craig DeForest <[email protected]>
wrote:
> I always add, in the acknowledgement section,
>
> "This analysis used the freeware Perl Data Language (
> http://pdl.perl.org)."
>
> or something similar.
>
>
>
> > On Oct 28, 2014, at 9:40 AM, Demian Riccardi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > I’m about to submit a revised manuscript (after mostly positive reviews)
> on my library (HackaMol) in which I discuss a goal of future use of PDL in
> extensions. Any preference to how I cite PDL?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Demian
> > _______________________________________________
> > Perldl mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Perldl mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
>
_______________________________________________
Perldl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
