Matthew Astley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 08:25:51PM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > Andrew Maltsev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > > So, as bad as it looks, my vote is still for:
> > >
> > > if(!defined($exception) || ref($exception) || length($exception)) {
> >
> > My vote is for Graham Barr to accept my patch and release a new
> > version of Error.pm :-(
>
> Can we ship our package as it is, plus two diff files - one for
> Error.pm and one for our exception handlers, and instruct people to
> patch one of their installed copies?
Could do.
> I'm taking the "get the users to do your dirty work of pestering
> Graham" approach. It's Lazy but perhaps not polite..?
Well ... I sent him the patch on 13th February. I also reported a bug
with Mail::Internet on 2nd April 2000 and never got a reply. Not sure
what the correct approach is really. Maybe just another friendly
poke?
_______________________________________________
Perlunit-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perlunit-users