Stephen wrote:

> I think the path forward is more like making opportunistic
> security mechanisms (in particular confidentiality) more-than-MTI
> in a way that builds in some security (against passive attacks)
> as an inherent feature of new protocols, but also results in
> a far easier transition from there to fully authenticated,
> compared to the massive gap between cleartext and fully
> authenticated.

Teasing out OE from other potential tasks is a good thing; of that I'm
convinced.  Whether it's more than MTI *or even MTI* depends on what
recommendations can be made regarding how to do it.  A draft there would
be most welcome (I've heard that some are thinking about doing something
with OTR).

Eliot
_______________________________________________
perpass mailing list
perpass@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass

Reply via email to