On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>
> On Feb 8, 2012, at 6:43 AM, Satish Balay wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Barry Smith wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:09 PM, Sean Farley wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm sure Jed (or Matt in his prime) could have run over to IIT and
> restarted the machine in less time than this :-)
> >>>
> >>> Sure, and like everybody else they would have had to wait outside
> until they had keys :-)
> >>
> >>   Those guys are very resourceful; I cannot image a simple locked door
> would be an issue for them.
> >>
> >>   Barry
> >>
> >>   Besides who the heck set up the machine so it cannot be started
> remotely? Should have used an Apple machine :-)
> >
> >
> > It was a human error [when you tell something to shutdown - it should
> not automatically restart].
> >
> > yeah - if we installed server infrastructure with remote admin feature
> > - then it could have been powered up remotely [from the remote
> > management console or something like that..]
>
>    Isn't that a basic Linux thing, start on LANS signal.
>
> >
> > looks like folks [Sean,Matt,Barry] are happy with bitbucket.
>
>    Not me. I'm not happy with it.  I prefer the PETSc machine, bitbucket
> is just a back up when the PETSc machine goes down. If the PETSc machine is
> back up then we switch the master repository back.


What is wrong? Not enough freedom to mess up the machine? I don't feel like
pushing 2 places.

  Matt


>
>   Barry
>
> >
> > Sean - you'll have to transfer all repos and keys to the new site.
> >
> > For now - I've removed petsc-dev and BuildSystem from petsc.cs.iit -
> > and will plan a phased shutdown of the machine - as soon as you can
> > find new home for all repos.
> >
> > Satish
>
>


-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120208/7f543a21/attachment.html>

Reply via email to