On Feb 8, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Sean Farley <sean at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> There is only a 1-level hierarchy based on a top level account. Sean created
> 'petsc' for our stuff. We can create many, so that
> we have 'petsc-release', 'petsc-private', etc. if we want. Of course, I want
> traditional hierarchy, and will file a feature request.
>
> If you phrase it like that ("traditional hierarchy"), then it will fall on
> deaf ears. The most I could see them adding is a way to create repo groups
> based on user groups (which exist currently). If you want your own personal
> collection of repos right-fucking-now, then fork the repos you want into your
> own account, like so:
>
> https://bitbucket.org/seanfarley/petsc-dev
>
> The nice thing about this is that you can tell where it was forked from:
> "(fork of petsc / petsc-dev)"
>
> No I mean I want
>
> petsc/releases/petsc-3.1
> petsc/tools/parsing/BarrysNewHTMLMunger
Yes. If you can't have that then it is a pretty crappy system. Sort of like
IBM 360 where you only had a root directory with a truckload of files in it. In
excusable in 2012 (or even 1972).
Barry
>
> Matt
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments
> is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments
> lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
