On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Sean Farley <sean at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> There is only a 1-level hierarchy based on a top level account. Sean >> created 'petsc' for our stuff. We can create many, so that >> we have 'petsc-release', 'petsc-private', etc. if we want. Of course, I >> want traditional hierarchy, and will file a feature request. >> > > If you phrase it like that ("traditional hierarchy"), then it will fall on > deaf ears. The most I could see them adding is a way to create repo groups > based on user groups (which exist currently). If you want your own personal > collection of repos right-fucking-now, then fork the repos you want into > your own account, like so: > > https://bitbucket.org/seanfarley/petsc-dev > > The nice thing about this is that you can tell where it was forked from: > "(fork of petsc / petsc-dev)" > No I mean I want petsc/releases/petsc-3.1 petsc/tools/parsing/BarrysNewHTMLMunger Matt -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120208/554ea262/attachment.html>