> On Nov 12, 2017, at 11:21 AM, Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Satish Balay <ba...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > On Sun, 12 Nov 2017, Matthew Knepley wrote: > > > > > Have we tried histogramming test times? It would be nice to know how much > > cumulative > > time it takes to run 37%, 67%, 95%, etc. > > I'm not sure what 'histogramming test time' means. > > The below looked like cumulative times over all tests. I want the time for > each test, and then > we bin them into say 10s wide bins and see which ones are taking the most > time.
WE FREAKING NEED TO CONVERT TO THE NEW TEST HARNESS TO DO THIS, then it is easy. So everyone, please, instead of spending twenty minutes a day sending and reading email about testing spend 20 minutes a day converting examples from the old tests to the new harness!!!!! > > Matt > > All logs record time. And Karl's script summarizes those times on the > dashboard. For eg: > > http://ftp.mcs.anl.gov/pub/petsc/nightlylogs/archive/2017/11/11/maint.html > > If you want to do some analysis on those times - you can grab the > [historical] logs and run the required analysis. > > Satish > > > > -- > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments > is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments > lead. > -- Norbert Wiener > > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
