On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 01:39:04PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote: > On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 11:24:57PM -0500, Michael Lucas wrote: > > When I add a ToS field to that same rule, it appears that that rule is > > not being processed; instead, it uses the default "pass all" rule and > > queue. My first thought is that the ToS is wrong, but it's taken > > right from Henning Brauer's altq/pf integration message, and I'm > > assuming he's infallible. There's probably some subtlety that I'm > > missing. > > yeah, the subtlety you're missing is that I'm not infallible ;-)
Well, *my* worldview has just taken a nasty shock. So, just to confirm: That syntax would be correct for a protocol that *did* set the ToS, i.e., pass out proto tcp from ($ExtIf) to any port $Port keep state tos 0x10 queue blah > the docs have been fixed in the meantime ;-) Ah. Well, all right then. It was late anyway, and I really did need to go to bed, so it's just as well. ;-) ==ml -- Michael Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/q/Big_Scary_Daemons Absolute BSD: http://www.AbsoluteBSD.com/
